Most family-law business valuations live or die on three things: how the marital and non-marital portions get separated, how personal goodwill gets carved out from enterprise goodwill, and whether the report can survive cross-examination by the opposing expert. I prepare the report knowing all three will be tested — because in my practice, they almost always are.
Most divorce business valuations never get tested above the trial court. When mine have, they have held up. Two engagements have gone the full distance — through trial, through appeal — and the appellate court affirmed the methodology and conclusion both times.
That matters because appellate review is the most contentious environment a business valuation can face. The opposing expert has had time to dissect the report, the briefs are on the record, and the court isn't deciding facts — it's deciding whether the methodology was sound. Surviving that twice is the difference between a report and a credentialed report.
Family-law business valuations operate under a different set of rules than sale, gift-tax, or buy-out engagements. A generic appraiser who treats them the same gets caught. Here are the four issues every defensible report has to address.
If the business existed before the marriage, only the appreciation in value during the marriage is marital. The pre-marital basis is not. Tracing requires period-specific financial statements, an opening-balance valuation, and a defensible allocation method. Get it wrong and you've handed over property that was never marital to begin with — or kept property that was.
Florida and most jurisdictions distinguish between appreciation caused by the spouse's labor (marital) and appreciation caused by passive market forces (often non-marital, depending on the specific facts). The valuation has to attribute growth to specific drivers — operational improvements, market tailwinds, capital reinvestment, industry conditions — not just report a delta.
In Florida, personal goodwill — value tied to the individual spouse's reputation, skill, relationships, or specific licensure — is generally not a marital asset. Enterprise goodwill is. The boundary is contested in almost every closely-held business valuation, and the carve-out methodology has to be supported by an exhibit the trier of fact can follow. I use the 16-factor MUM model.
Florida courts have flexibility on valuation date — date of filing, date of trial, or some date in between. The choice can swing the conclusion materially, especially in volatile periods. The report has to either accept the date the parties or court have stipulated, or argue for the date that produces the most accurate result given the facts.
This is the single most important allocation in most divorce business valuations. Here's how I approach the line — and why a carve-out done correctly can move the equitable distribution outcome by hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Value tied to the operating spouse personally — reputation, professional license, individual referral relationships, distinctive expertise, individual customer loyalty. If the spouse left tomorrow, this value would walk out the door with them.
Value that lives in the business itself, separate from the operating spouse — established trade name, repeat customer base, location, systems, employees, vendor contracts, recurring revenue. If the spouse left tomorrow, the business would still produce most of its value.
Litigation is expensive, and most divorces don't need two competing experts duking it out. When both spouses (or both counsel) agree, I can be retained as the single neutral appraiser serving both sides — one number, one report, one expert who answers to the entire engagement rather than either party.
This is not theoretical. In the past three years I have been retained as the joint appraiser in multiple Florida family-law engagements where both spouses signed the engagement letter — including a 2023 Domino's Pizza valuation in Ocala where I represented both sides, and a 2022 HVAC business engagement in Marion County, also bilateral.
The neutrality designation is meaningful because it changes the rules: my deliverable is the same report to both parties at the same time, no party-favorable advocacy in the language, and no risk that the opposing expert will mischaracterize the methodology. For attorneys, it can dramatically lower cost and shorten the timeline. Ask if it fits your case.
Drawn from the public CV. Case captions are listed where they are already on the public record; otherwise the business type, county, and year are reported. The full litigation log is available on request.
| Engagement | Venue | Stage |
|---|---|---|
| Bail Bonds Business — Leone v. Leone | Sixth Judicial Circuit, FL | Mediation |
| Culver's Restaurant — Bethel v. Bethel | Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach Co., FL | Mediation |
| Childcare Center — Scott v. Scott | Fifth Judicial Circuit, Marion Co., FL | Court Testimony |
| Aftermarket Auto Parts — Ullrich v. Ullrich | First Judicial Circuit, Okaloosa Co., FL | Mediation |
| Home Health Agency | Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach Co., FL | Mediation |
| Domino's Pizza — Both spouses represented | Ocala, FL | Mediation |
| Construction Company — Cook v. Cook | Fifth Judicial Circuit, Lake Co., FL | Mediation |
| Medical Practice — Zimmermann v. Zimmermann | Fifth Judicial Circuit, Lake Co., FL | Court Testimony |
| Dentist Medical Practice | Pinellas Co. Circuit Court, FL | Mediation |
| HVAC Business — Kieffer v. Kieffer · Both spouses | Fifth Judicial Circuit, Marion Co., FL | Mediation |
| Law Practice — Wright v. Wright Affirmed on Appeal | Fifth Judicial Circuit, Marion Co., FL | Court Testimony |
| Chiropractic Clinic | Marion Co. Circuit Court, FL | Mediation |
| International Engagement — Shattah v. Harroch | Quebec, Canada | Mediation |
| ABA Therapy Practice — Kahrs v. Kahrs | Manatee Co., FL | Court Testimony |
| Pest Control Company — Fiscina v. Fiscina, No. 4D16-836 Affirmed on Appeal · Fla. 4th DCA · May 10, 2017 | Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach Co., FL | Court Testimony |
| Restaurant Chain | Waco, TX | Engagement |
Florida engagements span the First through Twentieth Judicial Circuits. Out-of-state engagements include Delaware, Texas, Arizona, and Quebec, Canada.
"Every report has my name and my signature. I do the work, I take the deposition, I sit in the chair."
In divorce, the methodology matters — but so does who is behind it. I am the appraiser who will personally complete your engagement, sit for the deposition, and take the stand if your case goes to trial. No junior staffer, no rotating team.
The CBA designation I hold is the only U.S. business-appraisal credential that requires peer review of completed reports as a condition of certification — fewer than 400 appraisers nationwide hold it. Two of my divorce reports have been challenged through full appellate review by the Florida appellate courts. Both were affirmed.
Schedule a confidential 30-minute intake call. We will discuss the triggering facts, the valuation date, the standard of value, whether a Phase I diagnostic or a full Conclusion of Value fits, and whether a joint-neutral engagement is on the table. No obligation either way.